top of page

 

#12: Navigating the ‘Post-Truth’ Era 

 

Summary: The current “post-truth” media climate offers an opportunity to examine false and/or exaggerated information, analyze various levels of false data and how truth is often misrepresented within the context it is given, rather than based on factual data and evidence-based research.
 
Learning Outcomes: Students will be able to…
•    critically analyze news and media sources for subjective statements
•    differentiate various false media content and seek out examples of false media to share with others
•    create a media product that demonstrates a various spectrum of partial truths. 

 

A. 10-15 Minute Lesson: Overview

 

Those who live in the United States are guaranteed a free press. However, this does not guaranteed a neutral or a true press. We can celebrate the journalistic freedom to publish without interference from the government. We can also celebrate the freedom to share multiple stories through multiple lenses, but it has always been up to the reader and/or viewer to decide what information they find reliable or credible. Some information is grounded in objective data, which is based on facts, such as the earth is round, etc. Other data is subjective, which is grounded in personal perspectives, feelings, and/or opinions, such as bananas taste good, etc. Both types of information impact the decision making process, where individuals negotiate what information they consider to be true or false. Another factor to consider is the context of a situation, such as what information in included, or omitted. 

​

Activity: Read the following information to the group/class and ask them to silently consider the following data: 

 

Consider the threat of dihydrogen monoxide, another term for hydroxic acid and a major component of acid rain. Read a few other facts about the substance. Dihydrogen monoxide:

​

  • is a universal solvent which dissolves more substances than any other acid known to man.

  • attributes to numerous deaths every year.

  • is a main byproduct of rocket fuel & may cause severe burns.  

  • forces many people to leave their homes because of dangerously high levels of the substance.

  • causes more destruction on the earth than any other chemical and, according to most geologists, erosion of natural landscapes.

  • can destroy most electrical appliances and electronic devices.

  • contributes to the “greenhouse effect.”

  • accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.  

  • is a substance that each Idaho citizen touches and consumes daily.

  • can be very dangerous, yet it is found in most Idaho homes.    

 

The overwhelming truth is that this substance causes harm and according to local authorities, should be taken very seriously. If you are concerned, we recommend contacting your local congressman and demanding a ban on dihydrogen monoxide in the state of Idaho.  

 

After hearing about the substance, ask the students/group to consider the following questions:

​

  1. Do you think the government should ban dihydrogen monoxide / hydroxic acid?  Why?

  2. Do you have enough facts to make a decision about this topic?

 

Discuss several of the student theories of why (or why not) the substance should theoretically be banned. Then explain there is one more piece of information they may find important to consider: 

 

One more important fact about the substance to consider: Dihydrogen Monoxide / Hydroxic acid is another word for water; H2O. Review each of the bullets above again to give context into how each statement is true based on specific conditions.

​

  1. How are each of the bullet statements above true about water?

  2. How does additional information about a topic change one’s perspective about a statement?

  3. How important is it to consider all the facts and/or research the validity of a statement before rushing to a decision or forming an opinion? 

 

This exercise is a prime example of how some disinformation or partial truths are often believed. The activity’s goal was to deceive and/or mislead. Specific facts were given, but the context and meaning were changed because key information was missing. This type of fact-editing happens throughout news media as well. To be a well-informed citizen, one must rely on diverse perspectives, analyzing the context and subjective data along with the factual, or objective data and/or historical research. It is also good practice to consider that as individuals, we may not have all the facts, therefore it is wise not to make assumptions about a topic until we have considered multiple perspectives.  

 

B. 20-30 Minute Activity:  The Spectrum of Truthiness. Television personality and comedian Stephen Colbert coined the term ‘truthiness’ as a noun which means “the belief in what you feel to be true rather than what the facts will support” (Colbert, 2005).

 

In today’s media climate, it can often be difficult to separate the false information from the factual. There is a spectrum of sorts, different levels of ‘truthiness,’ which scales various types of news and social media based on their level of truth, intention and purpose. Not all false information is malicious or detrimental, but it is important to be aware of the different types of false information that is commonly found throughout the current media landscape. For example:

​

  1. Satire: Aims to entertain with a comical, often exaggerated spin, and provide    commentary.

  2. Hoax: Aims to trick readers/viewers; similar to a practical joke.

  3. Misinformation: Aims to inform but mistakes are made in vetted the research; usually unintentional and retracted and/or corrected.

  4. Conspiracy Theory: Aims to explain real events with false information.

  5. Propaganda: Aims to persuade an audience with selective facts.

  6. Disinformation: Aims to deceive, confuse and mislead.

 

Activity: Match the ‘Truthiness.’ Consider the following photos and news articles to decipher which type of ‘truthiness’ each photo might represent. Match the images with one of the following choices which best describes its intention or goal:

​

  1. Satire

  2. Hoax

  3. Misinformation

  4. Conspiracy Theory

  5. Propaganda

  6. Disinformation

 

A. This photo went viral as a Hurricane Sandy image in 2012. Where does it fall on the spectrum of ‘truthiness?’

[Visual Description: A photo of the Statue of Liberty with a circular storm cloud and rain bearing down upon it.]

 

B. This photo went viral soon after the previous photo. Where does it fall on the spectrum of ‘truthiness?’

[Visual Description: The previous photo of the Statue of Liberty and storm cloud, but with other images photoshopped in as well such as Godzilla, Jaws, the Stay Puff Marshmallow Man, a dragon, a FOXNEWS logo and spacecrafts shooting green laser beams.]

 

C. This is a 2002 news story by the New York Times. Where does it fall on the spectrum of ‘truthiness?’

[Visual Description: A news article by the New York Times dated Sept. 8, 2002 with the headline: Threats and responses: The Iraqis; U.S. says Hussein Intensifies Quest for A-Bomb Parts]

 

D. This is a 1998 news story by a peer-reviewed medical journal The Lancet. Where does it fall on the spectrum of ‘truthiness?’

[Visual Description: An article from The Lancet dated February 28, 1998 with the headline:  RETRACTED: Ileal-lymphoid-modular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive development disorder in children.]

 

E. This is a headline from a popular news website. Where does it fall on the spectrum of ‘truthiness?’

[Visual Description: A large heading with no source or date listed: Pope Francis Shocks World, Endorses Donald Trump for President, Releases Statement over a large photo of Pope Francis and a large photo of presidential candidate Donald Trump.]

 

F. This is a headline from a popular news website. Where does it fall on the spectrum of ‘truthiness?’

[Visual Description: A news headline published 09/13/2016 at 7:01PM, subtitled: Election 2016, with the headline FRIENDS OF HILLARY SAY SHE HAS PARKINSON’S, with a small image of the author, Jerome R. Corsi and a large unflattering photo of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.]

 

Answers:

 

A. Hoax. The image was shared approximately 83,000 times in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy and was widely believed as true. The doctored image is a clip from the 2004 movie The Day After Tomorrow. Source:http://www.snopes.com/photos/natural/nystorm.asp

 

B. Satire. This photoshopped image was made public soon after the previous image as a comedic parody of viral images are believed to be true by the public. The second image was also widely shared and discussed on news outlets to debunk the previous hoax. Source: http://www.theonion.com/photos/mocksandynystorm/ 

 

C. Misinformation. On the part of the New York Times. AND/OR Propaganda. On the part of the United States government who shared intelligence information with the news media to create support for the impending invasion of Iraq. At the time, misinformation from government sources lead US officials to widely disseminate propaganda regarding Iraq’s capacity to create weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to news agencies and the American public. This theory was proven incorrect, as no WMD were ever found and the NYT acknowledged their part in printing the incorrect information. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/feb/15/defector-admits-wmd-lies-iraq-war

 

D. Misinformation. The medical journal issued a retraction for a journal article whose purpose was to inform the medical community, but further research demonstrated miscalculations, hence the medical information was deemed inaccurate. Source: http://www.thelancet.com

 

E. Disinformation. Although the source of this article describes itself as a “fantasy news website,” the specific purpose of this article, the heading and photograph was to deceive, confuse and mislead voters. Even if it is done in a satirical way, the method purposely misled thousands of people. Pope Francis maintains that he does not endorse any political candidate. Source: http://www.factcheck.org 

 

F. Conspiracy Theory. The source of this article intended to explain a real illness with a conjured story of false information. The source of this story is WorldNetDaily (WND), a politically conservative news aggregation site. The inaccurate information stemmed from intense speculation of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s health during the 2016 election. There was wide speculation regarding her health and hundreds of false articles were published online. Photos and video clips of the candidate were pieced together and narrated by real doctors who had never met Hillary Clinton or examined her. http://www.snopes.com/shakydiagnosis/    

 

C. 45-60 Minute Activity: Storyboard of Examples: Students will explore aggregated website such as BuzzfeedBreitbart, or Word Net Daily to look for photographs and/or articles that fall somewhere along the ‘truthiness spectrum.’ Take a screen shot of the image or article and save it as a photo. Use a media platform such as Canva or Padlet to create your own story board that lists several varieties of false information that fall along the spectrum of truthiness. Divide the students into small groups and encourage them to share their content with each other and/or the class.  Another option would be to assign each group one specific type of fallacy to find online, then share their findings with the class. See example below.

bottom of page